다정한 영어 [1261093] · MS 2023 · 쪽지

2024-03-04 22:36:23
조회수 4,646

영어 문항 출제자 목표인데 난이도 평가 좀

게시글 주소: https://market.orbi.kr/00067516649

ebs 소재 연계한 지문임 ㅇㅇ


Some theorists in meta-ethics have recently defended so-called 'meta-ethical pluralism', which denies that ordinary moral discourse is uniform, instead claiming that it contains several different concepts of morality. But critics have objected that such a theory cannot adequately explain both moral and meta-ethical disagreement, because the use of, or focus on, different concepts, respectively, means that speakers in these contexts would frequently end up talking past each other instead of having a genuine disagreement. In response, I will argue that, in both cases, pluralism leaves more room for disagreement than its critics have thought: in ordinary moral discourse, speakers could still (__________). And that undermines any immediate inference from the presence of disagreement to the falsity of pluralism.


① disagree about content that is communicated as a matter of pragmatics rather than semantics

② agree on the significance of communicating about moral matters

③ reach a consensus through shared experiences of moral education

④ interact successfully by means of logical inference in a dialogue

⑤ show explicit evidence by citing real case studies


난이도나 선지같은거 봐주셈 정답은


















1번임

0 XDK (+0)

  1. 유익한 글을 읽었다면 작성자에게 XDK를 선물하세요.


  • 첫번째 댓글의 주인공이 되어보세요.