상변쌤 질문입니다! (2)

1. Neither, then, can we rationally sustain the view that animals like them in being the experiencing
subjects of a life have less inherent value
in being the experiencing subject가 삶의 경험하는 주체라는 점에서 라고 되어있는데
그러면 원래 in (that they are[being]) the experiencing subject 였던건가요?

2.Eloquent not because it gives the audience a chance to stop and think but because it comples them to do so
위 문장이 어떻게 문장이 될 수 있나요? 앞에 it is 라도 생략된건가요??

3.Not only for relief from the one-way charge but to be able to think on their own instead of running with you
마찬가지로 어떻게 문장이 되는건가요?

4.For example, every dollar less that you pay for a car is your gain and the seller's loss
이 문장에서 less가 every dollar를 꾸미고 그 뒤에 that절이 every dollar less를 다시 꾸미는 건가요?

5. It would be better yet to pick the faces that one thinks others are most likely to think that
others think are the prettiest
첫번째 others와 두번째 others가 다른 대상인가요?

6.The note said that, since he had neglected to wear the tie, they might like to look at it for half an hour and then return it
여기서 might like to를 어떻게 해석하나요?

7. Herein lies its discrimination from true caution, which analyzes, and, having done so, scrutinizes details.
comma가 너무 많아요 흑흑
analyzes 와 scutinizes가 연결되었고 details을 동시에 목적어로 갖는건가요?
and 앞에 comma를 굳이 쓸필요가 있나요?
having done so 의 의미상의 주어는 true caution이고 분사구문 인가요?

감사합니다!